Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: May 2009

I’ve used the term Tralfamadorian to refer to people that blind themselves to the hard parts of life. It’s from Slaughterhouse-5, and for people of our generation I suppose talking about it is like saying “have you heard of this Gatsby book?”

But for the Vonnegut virgins: a Tralfamadorian is an alien that looks like a plunger with a hand at the top of its handle, and in the hand it holds a large eyeball. They, and apparently every creature in the universe except humans, live time achronologically, traveling easily through their lives at will. They focus all their attention on the good parts of life, and whenever they see something unpleasant, they close their hands over their eyes to keep from seeing it, and travel freely to happier times.

Alan Moore’s forthcoming novel (edging towards 3/4 of a million words long) contains “an explanation of the afterlife that conforms to all known laws of physics.” So let’s talk just a little bit about living forever, living backwards, and life doubling back on itself.

Mr. Moore’s take:

Is death a fearful thing to you?
Not at all. Hopefully, if I do this book well enough, it will perhaps take some of the anxiety off of other people’s shoulders…. I started to formulate the theory, the idea [of] transience: that time is passing, that life is going away somewhere, that this is an illusion, albeit a persistent one. And I think I can explain that pretty well somewhere in the course of this 2,000-page leviathan.

Is there is an afterlife?
Well, we may not need one. That, just conceivably, we might get this life forever — you’ll have to read the book to get the whole thing, but I tend to think that it’s a pretty watertight theory: That you don’t get reincarnated as somebody else, but that you get reincarnated as yourself, over and over again. You have the same thoughts, and you never know you’ve done this [before], except for those little moments of déjà vu.   (link, it’s on page 4)

From The Man Who Grew Young by Daniel Quinn, where the universe has expanded as far as it can go and is now compressing, and the main character is living life backwards until The Big Crunch (honestly, Science, can’t you do better than The Big Crunch? The Big Crush would be slightly more palateble):

It was a good time to be alive. The days of catastrophe were only a memory. In a matter of forty years, the human population had dropped from eleven billion to less than six. The water in the pipes, in the lakes and rivers, was barely poisonous now. Blindness and skin cancer weren’t as commonplace as they had once been. For reasons not entirely clear, what had once been a rather tenuous layer of ozone was now growing, thick, and many scientists viewed this as a good sign for the future, though I wasn’t exactly sure why.

At the newspaper, we’d recently gotten rid of our computer system, to everyone’s relief. I think we all felt more valuable relying on our own brains and muscles.

Every year, the planet was growing greener. Scientists said this explained why the air was getting cleaner. Or partly explained it. Of course, factories were running day and night, and that helped. Every year, billions of tons of fossil fuel were going into the ground.

And from Slaughterhouse-5, where the protagonist, having come “unstuck in time,” watches a war movie backwards. The passage that made me love Vonnegut:

American planes, full of holes and wounded men and corpses took off backwards from an airfield in England. Over France, a few German fighter plans flew at them backwards, sucked bullets and shell fragments from some of the planes and crewmen. They did the same for wrecked American bombers on the ground, and those planes flew up backwards to join the formation.

The formation flew backwards over a German city that was in flames. The bombers opened their bomb bay doors, exerted a miraculous magnetism which shrunk the fires, gathered them into cylindrical steel containers, and lifted the containers into the bellies of the planes. The containers were stored neatly in racks. The Germans below had miraculous devices of their own, which were long steel tubes. They used them to suck more fragments from the crewmen and planes. But there were still a few wounded Americans, though, and some of the bombers were in bad repair. Over France, though, German fighters came up again, made everything and everybody as good as new.

When the bombers got back to their base, the steel cylinders were taken from the racks and shipped back to the United States of America, where the factories were operating night and day, dismantling the cylinders, separating the dangerous contents into minerals. Touchingly, it was mainly women who did this work. The minerals were then shipped to specialists in remote areas. It was their business to put them into the ground, to hide them cleverly, so they would never hurt anybody ever again.

The American fliers turned in their uniforms, became high school kids. Hitler turned into a baby, Billy Pilgrim supposed. That wasn’t in the movie, Billy was extrapolating. Everybody turned into a baby, and all humanity, without exception, conspired biologically to produce two perfect people named Adam and Eve, he supposed.

Where I am in my life, right now, I think it’d be alright if dying meant reliving this someday.

(Hope: no you’re not)

kisss

This is my last great love and my once-surrogate-brother. They disappeared from my life completely to be with each other.

See, I pick my scabs.

It’s a chronic thing; the first day of track in high school, someone cut in front of me and I faceplanted on the concrete (because, naturally, we ran in the quad instead of on the actual track that day). I had this quarter-sized bloody welt on my elbow and another one on my knee. Took months to heal, partly (okay, largely) because I kept picking off the scab to see how healed it was. The scar it left is the result of peeling scab from skin, as I’m sure others are. It’s like the sensation of torquing a muscle, and then stretching it just to see how long it takes to hurt, and how much. If I didn’t poke my bruises, how would I know how much they still hurt? And how would I know how quickly they heal?

Is this picture easy to look at? No. Let me rephrase: hell no. But it’s reality. I don’t want to be okay with it just because I’m not looking at it. With no contact for over a year, it’s the first sign I’ve gotten that they are still together, and they certainly do look  happy. It’s a test of how okay I am to know that, for once, I’m more happy for them than sad that I won’t know them as I did if I ever see them again. A reminder that maybe the end result, at least on one end, was worth what it took to get there. All can do with myself is try to be happy where I am, with what I have, and retcon the whole thing into a worthwhile journey. So, now and then, I have to look.

(and by all means, follow the link to her site, she’s talented)

Some words of wisdom from people way wiser than me:

The Raw Spot

Excerpts:

“Loss… wounds you so much that your bruised heart just sort of falls open, and love rushes into and out of that opening. Love that was maybe there all along, but you didn’t notice it because you were too busy, too preoccupied with other things to feel it.” (Ian, am I getting hokey here?)

“Here’s what I learned: when you’re dead, you can’t do anything.”

“When there is loss, love rushes into the absence. And that that love, if you pay attention to it, moves yourself to some kind of inspired action. If you are able to give yourself to the loss, to move toward the loss rather than away, to try to escape or deny or distract or obscure, which is what we usually do, it’s very natural. If you don’t do that, and instead turn towards the loss, your heart is wounded but the love fills it up, and out of that fullness comes a new life… The Baddrihana teacher Tojung Chumpa (?) who died many years ago used to talk about a soft spot, a raw spot, a wounded spot on the body or in the heart, a spot that is painful and sore to the touch. We really don’t like these raw spots and we spend a lot of time trying to prevent ourselves from getting one. And if it turns out we can’t prevent ourselves from getting one, then we try to protect ourselves with the spot, protect ourselves with something, favor it so that somehow it won’t get rubbed or bumped, nobody will pour hot or cold water on it and make it smart. And this raw spot is no fun. And yet it’s thanks to this spot that we can feel beauty, that we can appreciate poetry and music, Chunkpa called this raw spot ‘embryonic compassion’. Our loss, our wound, our raw spot is precious to us because it wakes us up to love and to compassionate action.”

“It’s the embryo of compassion waiting to be born. And as we all know, birth is not a picnic, birth is painful.”

No Second Arrow

And some guided meditations, too:

Close your eyes…

And breathe slowly…

Ze always cheers me up.

(it’ll be ok)

One of my favorite xkcd’s, from back before it jumped the shark:

Why Do You Love Me?

Speaking of xkcd, here are a few other favorites.

P, if you’re reading this, these two always make me think of you.

As long as we’re being funny…

Louis CK showed up on my radar as one of the funnier ethical comedians. Though he’ll make cracks about flamingly gay guys on the street, he comes down pretty hard on homophobes. He also talks about how great it is to be white until we eventually get what’s coming to us. Plus, being broke, his routine about being broke is heavenly.

His comedy became a lot more about how miserable his married life is, which was so sad and funny in that way that makes you cringe (routines about how his daughter’s an asshole, and how great it would be to punch her in the face). He always concludes with “I love my family… but wouldn’t it be great if I didn’t?

So I’m kind of glad he finally got divorced, because dude, relationships don’t have to be that way. But then, I’m young and unattached and want to believe there’s something better for me.

Um. In other funny, Mitch Hedberg:

‘Cause we don’t laugh enough:

The lovely Miss Cho, esp. starting at 3:3o

And Demetri Martin.

And from Ira (Ian, can you help with formatting?):

Santaland Diaries

Santaland Diaries

Fiasco!

fiasco!

[fix'd! -I]

“Why should we love our enemies? The first reason is fairly obvious. Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Hate multiples hate, violence multiplies violence, and toughness multiplies toughness in a descending spiral of destruction… The chain reaction of evil–hate begetting hate, wars begetting more wars–must be broken, or we shall be plunged ino the dark abyss of annihilation.  

But there is another side which we must never overlook. Hate is just as injurious to the person who hates. Like an unchecked cancer, hate corrodes the personality and eats away its vital unity. Hate destroys a man’s sense of values and his objectivity. It causes him to describe the beautiful as ugly and the ugly as beautiful, and to confuse the true with the false and the false with the true…

To our most bitter opponents we say: ‘We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you… Send your hooded perpetrators of violence into our community at the midnight hour and beat us and leave us half dead and we shall still love you. But be ye assured that we will wear you down by our capacity to suffer. One day we shall win freedom, but not only for ourselves. We shall so appeal to your heart and conscience that we shall win you in the process, and our victory will be a double victory.’”

- the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. , Strength to Love, p. 52-56

“Good evening, Major, my name is Muybridge and here is the answer to the letter you sent my wife.”

-Eadweard Muybridge, immediately before shooting Major Harry Larkyns, his wife’s lover. The murder was ruled a justifiable homicide.

“It was not a significant bullet. I am not afraid.”

-Werner Herzog, after taking a shot from an air rifle during a BBC interview. He continued the interview and showed off his wound. (link)

“Melancholy and irascible.”

-Doctor’s assessment of Richard Lawrence, who stepped out of the crowd at a funeral and fired a derringer at President Andrew Jackson from three paces, then stepped closer and fired a second at point blank range. Both misfired. Jackson beat Lawrence to the ground with his cane. Lawrence was confined to a mental institution on grounds of insanity. (link)

“Don’t hurt the poor creature!”

-Theodore Roosevelt to the crowd attacking John Schrank, who had just shot Roosevelt in the chest. The bullet had been slowed by Roosevelt’s speech, folded over in his breast pocket, which Roosevelt insisted on reading, truncated, to the crowd, while still bleeding from the chest. (link)

Note: less than a century ago, a presidential candidate begged the crowd to not harm the man who had just shot him. It’s worth remembering that.

Kindness

Before you know what kindness really is
you must lose things,
feel the future dissolve in a moment
like salt in a weakened broth.
What you held in your hand,
what you counted and carefully saved,
all this must go so you know
how desolate the landscape can be
between the regions of kindness.
How you ride and ride
thinking the bus will never stop,
the passengers eating maize and chicken
will stare out the window forever.

Before you learn the tender gravity of kindness,
you must travel where the Indian in a white poncho
lies dead by the side of the road.
You must see how this could be you,
how he too was someone
who journeyed through the night with plans
and the simple breath that kept him alive.

Before you know kindness as the deepest thing inside,
you must know sorrow as the other deepest thing.
You must wake up with sorrow.
You must speak to it till your voice
catches the thread of all sorrows
and you see the size of the cloth.

Then it is only kindness that makes sense anymore,
only kindness that ties your shoes
and sends you out into the day to mail letters and purchase bread,
only kindness that raises its head
from the crowd of the world to say
it is I you have been looking for,
and then goes with you every where
like a shadow or a friend.

-Naomi Shihab Nye

Elaine Scarry writes:

“Whatever pain achieves, it achieves in part through its unsharability, and it ensures this unsharability through its resistance to language.” (p. 4)

“…to have great pain is to have certainty; to hear that another person has pain is to have doubt. (The doubt of the other persons, here as elsewhere, amplifies the suffering of those already in pain.)” (p. 7)

(My only beef with Ms. Scarry is the distinction she makes between mental and physical pain.)

The strangest thing may be how easy it is to even forget one’s own pain, to underestimate it in retrospect. As C.S. Lewis writes:

“People get over these things. Come, I shan’t do so badly. One is ashamed to listen to this voice but it seems for  a little to be making a good case. Then comes a sudden jab of red-hot memory and all this ‘commonsense’ vanishes like an ant in the mouth of a furnace.”

I want to not have this disbelief, this barrier between myself and my past, between myself and other people. I want to use my suffering to open and soften my heart, to make me more compassionate. Pain can do that – soften your edges, melt them. It can be like taking off a layer of callous.

Drop a line if you want the audiofile of the poem.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.